#GNUPLOT FIT WINDOWS#

(The read/write door was damaged.) We ran our file/repair tools on it and salvaged a lot of data, but word/wordpad/notepad could not open the file she needed most.ĪbiWord did. It will open files that nothing else can, and if it can’t, then the file really is toast.Ĭase in point - right at finals time we had a student come to the computer help desk with a rather battered floppy. (I’ve never tried it with a 100+ pager.)Īnd you are completely right about using AbiWord to save “corrupted” documents. That said, I’ve never noticed godawful lagtime in saving or opening 20+ page documents. (Nothing I can’t quickly clean up, but annoying nonetheless.)

I’ve had some problems with garbled docs when I go from AbiWord to Office and vice versa. I also have it as a backup on my OS X computers. I found the AbiWord review to be pretty dead on - and AbiWord is the wordprocessor of choice on my Xubuntu system. I didn’t mean to do that–I just meant to type a reply agreeing with you. Wow, I just typed a mini-review of WordPerfect. I’m not all that fond of OO.o because it seems to try to mimick MS Word too much, and I use WP because I don’t like MS Word. OO.o converts ODF to WPD (and vice versa) very well. I keep OO.o around for when I need to work with Cyrillic, Japanese, and ODF documents. My only complaints with WordPerfect’re the lack of Unicode and ODF support. MS Word was no doubt what they learned in school. All of the other students that “hated” WordPerfect switched to MS Word mode and were happy campers. When I had a summer job at a big law firm, they used WordPerfect 12 (I think–it could have been 11). If you don’t like the interface, you can always switch to MS Word mode in the workspace manager. Frankly, to me, WordPerfect’s help file sucks (and the “HTML Help” in WordPerfect X3 isn’t much better than the older help files), but it’s not too big of a deal for me because I don’t use it often. I find myself reaching for the help files a lot in MS Word and OO.o, but very seldom in WordPerfect. To me, it seems everything in WordPerfect is presented very intuitively and works exactly like you’d expect it to–but that could be because I was “raised” on WP. Sure, you can do that in other word processors, but it’s a lot easier and more intuitive in WordPerfect. “Make it Fit” and “Keep Text Together” are probably my next favorite features.

I pretty much could not use MS Word until they introduced that reveal-codes-like feature in Word XP.

#GNUPLOT FIT WINDOWS#

WP on Windows has the best automatic text kerning I’ve seen in a word processor (although it looks nasty on screen at first, until you get used to it). We actually learned WP instead of MS Word.) Hell, I still fire up WP 5.1 DOS when I want to get some “real” work done, namely creative writing. (And I’m only 21 years old we used it in elementary, middle, and high school. I’m not trying to bash OOo as I keep it around for some features that WordPerfect doesn’t have, but overall I just find it hard to use and lacking in areas I’m use to. If somebody would come along and make a better WordPerfect (including Reveal Codes) I would switch, but OpenOffice definitely isn’t it. According to the many reports I’ve read or heard it would take a complete rewrite of WordPerfect to have real Unicode support and Corel doesn’t have the man power to do it. I can’t say that it’s 100%, but as a WordPerfect user I thought the WordPerfect review was very good.Īs for Unicode support in WordPerfect. However, it never fails that when people decide to compare office programs WordPerfect is always left out. G(x) = h + i*x + j*x**2 + k*x**3 + l*x**4 + m*x**5 + n*x**6įit g(x) 'HH.It was nice to finally see WordPerfect compared to Office and OpenOffice.Īs a WordPerfect user I always feel like the black sheep of the office users, but I still think it’s better than Office or OpenOffice. #plot 'HH.DAT' using 1:2 smooth frequency title 'frequency' #plot 'HH.DAT' using 1:2 smooth unique title 'unique' #plot 'HH.DAT' using 1:2 smooth sbezier title 'sbezier' #plot 'HH.DAT' using 1:2 smooth bezier title 'bezier' #plot 'HH.DAT' using 1:2 smooth csplines title 'csplines' #plot 'HH.DAT' using 1:2:(1.0) smooth acsplines title 'acsplines' Final polynomial equations after fitting. Second polynomial equation after fitting.

One was fitted on the data between x = 0-200 and another in the range x = 200-900. I wanted an equation to summarise the following data so that it could conveniently be used for some calculations, after many attempts I found that I could fit the data using 2, 6 order polynomials.

Gnuplot fit